Argument
βJews have been expelled from 109 countries β what do they have in common?β
Look at the list: England, France, Spain, Portugal, hundreds of cities and states. When one country expels you, maybe it's them; when 109 do, maybe it's you. Jews must be doing something to provoke it.
Is this an actual argument? We haven't yet found it in a public source
Traps in play:β The exception as proofβ "They allβ¦"β DARVO: deny, attack, reverse
Why people find it convincing
- Jews really were expelled from many places: England (1290), France (1306 and 1394), Spain (1492), Portugal (1496β97), many German cities and principalities, and after 1948 from much of the Arab world.
- A long list feels like a pattern, and a pattern feels like it must have a cause in the people it happens to.
- The list circulates as a neat meme with a precise-sounding number, which makes it look researched.
What's true
Expulsions were real, repeated and devastating.
The major countrywide expulsions of medieval and early modern Europe are well documented, and so are countless expulsions from individual cities, bishoprics and principalities, and the flight and expulsion of Jews from Arab countries after 1948. They are part of why Jewish history so often reads as a history of flight.
What's left out
How the number is made, why rulers expelled, and who else was expelled.
The '109' is not a count of countries. It comes from lists that add up cities, duchies, bishoprics and short-lived states, and count the same place several times for repeated expulsions; it was reportedly first compiled by a Holocaust-denial group β . Countrywide expulsions number a handful. Their causes are on the record: rulers seizing Jewish property or cancelling their own debts to Jewish lenders (England 1290, France 1306), and religious uniformity campaigns (Spain 1492). Many others were expelled the same way: Spain's Muslims (the Moriscos, 1609β14), France's Protestants (1685), Roma across Europe. And the same history has many places that invited Jews in, among them Poland-Lithuania, the Ottoman Empire after 1492, the Dutch Republic and Cromwell's England (1656).
Traps here:β The exception as proofβ "They allβ¦"
advocacy / viewAish, 'Debunking Antisemitism: The 109 Countries Myth' β
On the list's construction and origin β verify the origin claim against a second, non-advocacy source.
Where it leads if pressed
Blaming the persecuted for their persecution.
'What do they have in common?' has only one intended answer: the Jews. The same reasoning would blame the Moriscos for Spain, the Huguenots for Louis XIV, and Roma for every town that drove them out. It's the logic of 'where there's smoke there's fire', applied to a minority at the mercy of those who expelled it, and it's the step from history to antisemitism. It also explains, in reverse, why many Jews concluded they needed one place from which they couldn't be expelled (see 'Jews can only be safe as a majority in their own state').
Traps here:β DARVO: deny, attack, reverseβ The strict enemy frame
The usual reply β and its own traps
Arguments travel in pairs. Here is what the other side typically answers. Check whether both lean on the same trick.
heard from pro-Israel voicesβJews can only be safe as a majority in their own state.β